Peace and coexistence.

Key tags: Camp David, Jordan agreement, Oslo agreement, Abraham accords

Israel’s foreign relations are influenced primarily by the strategic situation in the Middle East. On its establishment, the newborn state of Israel was rejected by all regional States and Muslim countries. Wars to eliminate the Jewish state were waged by neighbouring states in 1948-9, 1967, and 1973.

Commencing in the 1920s but prevalent especially since the 1960s, terror attacks have been the prevalent form of force used to coerce the Jewish populace into political submission. In contrast, Jewish private, societal, and governmental initiatives have been launched in order to promote co-existence.

Application to Israel

Today, Israel has full diplomatic relations with two of its Arab neighbors, Egypt and Jordan, after signing peace treaties with them, in 1979 and 1994, respectively. The Camp David Accords of 1979 between Egypt and Israel formed an agreement for which Israel surrendered the Sinai desert, an area three times the geographical size of Israel. In 1994, the Jordan-Israel Peace Treaty was signed, addressing land and water disputes, tourism and trade, and obligating both countries to prevent their territory from being used as a staging ground for military strikes by a third country. Even though the agreements have held steady for several decades, they are termed “cold” peace, as there is little contact between the countries and there are recurring sources of tension between them.

Another major milestone was the signing in the early 1990s of the Oslo Accords. They are a series of agreements that created the Palestinian Authority (“PA”) and by which Israel recognized the “legitimate rights” of the “Palestinian people” concerning self-determination. Many issues were meant to be resolved under permanent status negotiations envisioned by the Oslo Accords, however, progress has been minimal.

The PA has unilaterally pursued international recognition of statehood outside of negotiations, principally through the UN. Although peace talks under the Oslo Accords have stagnated, agreements between the parties remain the necessary way to peace. Thus, the influence of international resolutions or decisions is indeterminate.

In 2020, Israel signed agreements establishing diplomatic relations with three Arab League countries, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, and Morocco. The agreements were facilitated by the U.S. Administration and called the ‘Abraham Accords’. Their premise is that diplomacy and communication would further stability and prosperity in the region. The recent normalization agreements indicate that a growing number of states prefer to switch to a more pragmatic partnership with Israel.

Search

Filters

Information type
Selecteren
Information type
eu israel flags
Refuting the conclusion that Israel is in breach of Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement
Israel pal flag
Israel’s Humanitarian Aid Policy in Gaza Does Not Amount to Starvation—Let Alone Genocide
ICJ inside
thinc. makes written Statement to ICJ concerning Israel’s relations with UNRWA
ICC jpg
ICC investigation into the situation in Palestine: Appeals Chamber admits Israel’s appeal on jurisdiction
ICJ South Africa
South Africa´s genocide claims against Israel: currently status
Dreaming the dream of a free Lebanon
Dreaming the Dream of a Free Lebanon
Dear UNRWA - Steve Z - image
Dear UNRWA, citizens of Palestine can’t also be Palestinian refugees
Zipperstein Israel-Hamas War
The Israel-Hamas War: Self Defense, Necessity and Proportionality
hamas terrorists
Hamas, the hostages and the “occupation” myth
IL PAL FLAGS
BRIEFING PAPER - The Future of the “Occupied Palestinian Territory”:
Hostage taking - remembrance - israeli flag
Hostage-Taking as a War Crime: The Tragic Fate of the Bibas Family and Israel’s Ongoing Grief
Iran EU
International law organization urges Italy and all EU member states to list IRGC as terror organization
Video Thumbnail: Robert Nicholson
Is Just Statecraft Useful for Statecraft?
Alan Shatter
Smoke & Mirrors: The United States, Ireland & Israel
ICJ inside
Using the ICJ as a political weapon against Israel – and avoiding the real problem of terror
Palace of Nations, Geneva
Francesca Albanese - a biased Special Rapporteur - is invited to speak in the Dutch Parliament
ICC jpg
The International Criminal Court’s imbalanced justice
Screenshot 2025-01-08 162027
The curious case of Francesca Albanese
Flag of the United Nations
UN Adopts Two New anti-Israel Resolutions
Amnesty Intl
Amnesty International seeks to expand the concept of genocide
Search

Support thinc. - Your guide to Israel and international law

Welcome. thinc offers our growing network of friends and experts worldwide insights relevant to the conflict between Israel and their adversaries through the lens of international law. – Support us from today from €5 per month.